Re: More enthusiasm than news in Fox's coverage of war

From: Dehede011@aol.com
Date: Tue May 27 2003 - 11:46:53 MDT

  • Next message: Lee Daniel Crocker: "Re: Reality bites"

    In a message dated 5/27/2003 12:23:42 PM Central Standard Time,
    mail@HarveyNewstrom.com writes: Because the Justice Department was not acting in the
    partisan manner that most people would have expected.

           Or because Ken Starr to that time was not known as a tough lawyer. Or
    was he put in there to have someone to gripe about?
           My thought was that he was put in as a whipping boy -- it was known
    that he would play fair. A man that would remain silent while those 42 lawyers
    in the White House trashed his good name is not an ogre but he is exactly what
    was needed.
    Ron h.



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue May 27 2003 - 11:58:30 MDT