Re: "liberal media"

From: Michael Wiik (mwiik@messagenet.com)
Date: Fri May 23 2003 - 07:23:13 MDT

  • Next message: Spudboy100@aol.com: "Sculpture: The Oldest Mind"

    Came across this yesterday, thought it was pertinent:

    <<Absolute proof the media ain't liberal

    By now you know of the FCC's pending plan to allow Rupert Murdoch to
    personally control everything you see and think. (OK, I'm exaggerating.
    Slightly.)

    If you'd like that not to happen, go hang out for a minute with
    MediaReform.net, the Consumers Union, MoveOn.org, or FAIR, to name a few
    folks who can help.

    Incidentally, there's one hell of a huge point to make of all this: if
    the media really was in liberal hands, then centralization of that power
    would be absolutely terrifying to the right wing. It would be all you
    ever heard about.

    And yet those guys are strangely silent. On their websites, neither Bill
    O'Reilly nor Rush Limbaugh so much as mention the issue, even once, at
    least as far as I can find.

    Point this out to people with ears and brains.

    It really should be the end of the "liberal media" argument.>>

    http://messagenet.com/fw/f1186.html
    aka
    http://www.thismodernworld.com/weblog/mtarchives/week_2003_05_18.html#000643

            -Mike

    -- 
    


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri May 23 2003 - 07:30:40 MDT