RE: PHYSICS: our increasingly strange universe

From: Emlyn O'regan (oregan.emlyn@healthsolve.com.au)
Date: Thu May 22 2003 - 01:41:02 MDT

  • Next message: Technotranscendence: "Man in the Image of Man: Cloning, Abortion, Contraception, Eugenics"

    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: spike66@attbi.com [mailto:spike66@attbi.com]
    > Sent: Thursday, 22 May 2003 4:14 PM
    > To: extropians@extropy.org
    > Subject: RE: PHYSICS: our increasingly strange universe
    >
    >
    >
    > > > > --- Emlyn O'regan <oregan.emlyn@healthsolve.com.au wrote:
    > > >
    > > > > > It's depressing how buggy the universe is.
    > > >
    > > > Depressing? It's elating. Explains the meaning of
    > > > human existence: we are evolving to debug this place.
    > > >
    > > > spike
    > > >
    > >
    > > If the meaning of life is that we are maintenance
    > programmers for a bug
    > > ridden, feature bloated universe, I'm going to be very annoyed...
    > >
    > > Emlyn
    >
    > No, Emlyn this is way overly pessimistic. We are here to
    > eventually transcend and do the final debugging. Thats
    > what the singularity is all about. Exciting stuff. Its
    > a great time to be alive. The meaning of life for all
    > previous generations was to survive to breed, so that
    > eventually the result would be us.
    >
    > spike
    >

    In my more pessimistic moments I always feel that this universe is worth
    being angry about. Look at the fate of those who went before us;
    ignominious, really. Implicitly, we assume that we wont share that fate, but
    that's not at all certain.

    The very fact that we have scarcity is crazy. Why isn't our environment
    directly manipulable; eg: why is there matter? Humans are having to go to
    absolutely extreme lengths to make matter behave like software (not there
    yet), when it could have been that way from the beginning.

    Existence just seems so bloody banal. It's a bad hollywood script that
    originating from what was once someone's good idea; you can still sense the
    spark of brilliance in there somewhere, but the implementation of reality
    seems hopelessly unimaginative and shitty. It's been thought up by the kinds
    of people that think we'll have traffic jams of flying cars in extreme urban
    future cities. Stupid.

    Not to say that these aren't interesting times, and that we can't add a few
    layers of implementation to create a much more satisfactory virtual universe
    running in the real one. But standing back, it really does look like we are
    making the best of an appalling job.

    Emlyn



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu May 22 2003 - 01:53:35 MDT