Re: "Hysteria, Thy Name is SARS"

From: Robert J. Bradbury (bradbury@aeiveos.com)
Date: Wed May 14 2003 - 04:12:12 MDT

  • Next message: Dossy: "Re: There's no such word as `virii'"

    On Wed, 14 May 2003, John K Clark wrote:

    > There have been reports that doctors in Hong Kong injected sick people with
    > a serum that contains antibodies to the SARS virus taken from recovered Sars
    > patients and it seemed to help. Robert I'd be interested to hear your
    > opinion about that.

    John, this would be consistent with standard "anti-venom" or "anti-toxin"
    therapies. Patients who have "recovered" are likely to carry a high
    titre of antibodies against the SARS virus -- these antibodies would
    allow the immune system to more quickly and easily engulf and absorb
    SARS virus particles reducing the spread of the infection. However
    injecting antibodies across species or even between individuals in
    the same species may be relatively problematic. While the protein
    sequence and 3-D structure of the "common" part of antibodies is
    relatively highly conserved (in contrast to the part of antibodies
    that is designed to "vary" to match the infectious agent) I suspect
    that efficacy may vary across species and individuals.

    Rafal might be better able to comment on this -- it is a "reasonable"
    strategy but one whose "success" may vary from case to case and be
    very difficult to generalize. It may come down to a question of the
    similarity between the immune systems of the donor and recipient
    (similar to the issues involved in organ transplants). And we have
    a long history of knowing how sometimes the transplants are successful
    and sometimes they are not.

    Robert



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed May 14 2003 - 04:23:57 MDT