Re: Antpower, was Re: The Nanogirl News~

From: Party of Citizens (citizens@vcn.bc.ca)
Date: Tue May 13 2003 - 17:24:55 MDT

  • Next message: Dehede011@aol.com: "Re: More enthusiasm than news in Fox's coverage of war"

    On Mon, 12 May 2003, Michael M. Butler wrote:

    > On Mon, 12 May 2003 17:55:03 -0700 (PDT), Adrian Tymes
    > <wingcat@pacbell.net> wrote:

    > > Inverting that, you'd need about
    > > 500,000 ants to generate one horsepower, assuming
    > > perfect conversion of lifting power to whatever output
    > > form (electricity, rotary motion) you desire. In
    > > reality, conversion losses would multiply that.
    > >
    > > When you consider the volume needed to store, harness,
    > > feed, motivate, et al that many ants, it might be more
    > > efficient - to say nothing of far cheaper - to get
    > > that 1 horsepower from a horse.
    >
    > Ah, but now thanks to you, we have the conversion factor: 1 hp = .5 Map.
    >
    > Thanks, that goes in my obscure measurements file.

    But just think of what will happen when the ants as well as the carbon
    nanotube harnesses can be built in nano-factories (by worker ants of
    course). All guarded by soldier ants. The Queen Ant will carry the major
    (AI) brain power and over-all surveillance responsibility.

    POC



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue May 13 2003 - 17:36:17 MDT