RE: "Hysteria, Thy Name is SARS"

From: Rafal Smigrodzki (rafal@smigrodzki.org)
Date: Tue May 13 2003 - 18:16:40 MDT

  • Next message: Adrian Tymes: "Re: Antpower, was Re: The Nanogirl News~"

    Pat Fallon wrote:

    > The samples Montagnier and Gallo called "viral isolates contain a
    > few objects that resemble retroviruses (the "HIV") plus lots of other
    > things, which clearly aren't viruses. Without a pure isolate of
    > virus-like particles, there is no way to extract proteins and
    > genetic material out of a molecular soup and know that they came from
    > one group of particular looking objects rather than another.

    ### Using PCR it is easy to purify genetic material and to produce all the
    proteins.

    ------------------------------------

     The following are three possible
    > explanations for why undiluted specimens of blood always react
    > positive at the ELISA test:
    > 1. Everybody has HIV antibodies...
    > 2. Everybody has different levels of HIV infection...
    > 3. The test is not specific for HIV...

    ### Explanation #4 - Persons who are unable to read the manual (or as
    sometimes abbreviated, RTFM) for the Elisa test should not be allowed inside
    a lab.

    (A remark for the non-biologists - antibodies have always some degree of
    nonspecific binding, especially in such complex mixtures as human serum, so
    if you use a very high concentration of the antibody or the serum, different
    from the concentrations the test was calibrated on, you will get a
    "positive" result)

    It's amazing that the anti-HIV fallacy keeps cropping up again and again,
    with ever more bizarre claims.

    Rafal



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue May 13 2003 - 15:27:22 MDT