RE: GM Foods Safe Enuf

From: Rafal Smigrodzki (rafal@smigrodzki.org)
Date: Fri May 09 2003 - 14:14:16 MDT

  • Next message: gts: "RE: (IRAQ) RE: Name calling vs. Ad Hominem"

    Greg wrote:
    > I think it's so sad that GM, instead of genetically modifying crops
    > to be healthier, more innately resistant to pests, instead went down
    > the path of making crops accept more pesticides and herbicides so
    > that more of the latter could be applied. That and using extremely
    > dangerous diseases for markers. What a mess... If GM had been more
    > responsible or regulated (waves down indignation), organic food
    > certification probably wouldn't have had to exclude GM foods.
    >
    >

    ### Do you have suggestions about how to make a crop more innately resistant
    to pests, or healthier?

    As it is, gene-engineers are achieving these goals, slowly, because they are
    difficult, and using bacterial toxins instead of chemical pesticides is one
    of the good ideas they initially came up with.

    Which extremely dangerous diseases used as markers do you mean?

    Rafal



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri May 09 2003 - 11:25:11 MDT