The misanthropic universe

From: Anders Sandberg (asa@nada.kth.se)
Date: Mon May 05 2003 - 10:41:11 MDT

  • Next message: Rafal Smigrodzki: "RE: Experiences with Atkins diet"

    Here is an intriguing paper, similar to some of stuff in the paper of Nick
    Bostrom and Milan M. Cirkovic (http://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9906042):

    http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-th/0208013

    (some comments at http://www.nature.com/nsu/020812/020812-2.html)

    Disturbing Implications of a Cosmological Constant

     Authors: Lisa Dyson, Matthew Kleban, Leonard Susskind

            In this paper we consider the implications of a cosmological
            constant for the evolution of the universe, under a set of
            assumptions motivated by the holographic and horizon complementarity
            principles. We discuss the ``causal patch" description of spacetime
            required by this framework, and present some simple examples of
            cosmologies described this way. We argue that these assumptions
            inevitably lead to very deep paradoxes, which seem to require major
            revisions of our usual assumptions.

    The image of the universe they arrive at undergoes inflation, expansion into
    a lifebearing state, then gradual heath death and being separated into
    nothingness by advancing horizons. Then nothing happens for titanic
    timescales, until random fluctuations cause new inflation or the ready-made
    assembly of an universe. And so on. However, they calculate that most
    universes that fit the anthropic principle (contain liveable worlds where
    humans can exist) will not be due to a consistent expansion from an
    inflation state, but due to a "miraculous" random assembly (their example is
    an universe with our element abundancies and same appearance, but 10K
    background temperature, which is inconsistent with primordial
    nucleosynthesis). These miraculous universes are far more likely than the
    plausible ones, so it is surprising that we see a physics that makes sense.
    Not even creationism helps, as they analyse in the paper, since a deliberate
    creation is only the start of a trajectory through this vast phase space.
    One has to drop some rather deep assumptions to get things to work.

    Sounds like it is in Nick's territory :-)

    -- 
    -----------------------------------------------------------------------
    Anders Sandberg                                      Towards Ascension!
    asa@nada.kth.se                            http://www.nada.kth.se/~asa/
    GCS/M/S/O d++ -p+ c++++ !l u+ e++ m++ s+/+ n--- h+/* f+ g+ w++ t+ r+ !y
    


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon May 05 2003 - 10:50:33 MDT