Re: Doomsday vs Diaspora

From: Charles Hixson (charleshixsn@earthlink.net)
Date: Thu May 01 2003 - 12:31:51 MDT

  • Next message: Rafal Smigrodzki: "RE: Removing lysosomal aggregates; obviating mitochondrial mutations"

    Spudboy100@aol.com wrote:

    > ...
    > Good point, but then we're now back at the thread concerning whether
    > its easier for a supercivilization (individuals or clades or
    > corporations) to focus on travel or complexity. You side with
    > complexity. But again, I ask, is there a natural limit to complexity,
    > that is, intelligence? Does intelligence have a max like lightspeed at
    > 300,000 klicks per second? If it does, do you think that might
    > motivate the brightest brains to travel? Travel for new materials, new
    > territory, isolation and growth potential?

    Intelligence is more difficult, but there appears to be a limit to the
    ability to transmit information. It may be significant that the limit
    of information containable within a singularity is porportional to the
    surface area of the event horizon, but that's a tighter limit than I was
    contemplating. Without speculating on more stringent conditions,
    however, if energy is quantized, and space-time is quantized, then a
    limit of one bit / energy quanta / minimal space-time interval seems
    appearant. Now this isn't a very stringent limit, since the
    quantization of space is supposed to occur at around 10^-66 cm, but if
    your minimal particle is an electron, you have a much more stringent
    limit.
    That said, this is merely information. Intelligence requires a lot more
    structure than mere information, so the limits are probably tighter.
    This probably means that computronium brains will need to be organized
    as clusters of clusters, and the more intelligent the required process,
    the slower the computation. Thus a physical simulation could probably
    be done quite quickly compared to an intelligent decision that required
    an equivalent amount of processing, because the pieces of the physical
    simulation could be done with a greater amount of isolation between the
    components.

    -- 
    -- Charles Hixson
    Gnu software that is free,
    The best is yet to be.
    


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu May 01 2003 - 12:41:59 MDT