Re: AI

From: Adrian Tymes (wingcat@pacbell.net)
Date: Wed Apr 16 2003 - 22:13:06 MDT

  • Next message: gts: "RE: evolution and diet (was: FITNESS: Diet and Exercise)"

    --- Keith Elis <hagbard@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
    > Has a software architecture been
    > described in enough
    > detail to settle that a program can successfully
    > modify itself?

    Actually, I've written some. Rather crude, and only
    allowed to run for a few generations before the
    solution was good enough to use, but it was
    self-modifying code.

    > How in
    > the world does it work?

    The approach I used was some basic genetic algorithms,
    examples of which you should be able to find by
    googling for that, with a fixed judgement package (in
    my case, comparing to known correct answers over a
    certain number of test cases). In theory, if one
    could
    write a judge to test for "intelligence" (which
    requires defining such), allowing the judge to form
    its own questions consistent with some rules so the
    algorithms are more likely to adapt for the rules than
    just for the judge, one could run an approach like
    that
    over many many generations. The difficulties there
    lie
    in writing a good judge (you can't do manual judging,
    since you need short generation times), and the large
    number of generations - and thus runtime - needed
    (even
    with 1 second generation times, if it takes a billion
    generations...). Neither one is a problem to be taken
    lightly.



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Apr 16 2003 - 22:20:47 MDT