Re: unicorn jelly complete and done; worth a read

From: Robert J. Bradbury (bradbury@aeiveos.com)
Date: Tue Apr 15 2003 - 14:41:48 MDT

  • Next message: T0Morrow@aol.com: "Re: Scuba (was FITNESS)"

    On Tue, 15 Apr 2003, Anders Sandberg wrote:

    > One can base a singularity on more than nanotechnology.

    Though I would agree with the statement -- one might well base
    a singularity on advanced biotechnology (which is really
    nanotechnology but not of the type normally thought about),
    or perhaps from Eliezer's perspective -- AI -- which we probably
    have the underlying technology to support already.

    But I presume from the context of your message that you
    intend to mean that singularities based on "magic physics"
    are possible (I haven't read the story). Anders -- I'm just
    going to have to whack you in the side of the head the next
    time we meet. "No magic physics"! You have to stick to
    the conventional game plan until we are uploaded (even
    if we are currently running in a simulation). *After*
    we are uploaded, then you can invoke all the magic physics
    you want because everyone will know we are turning the
    dials at random to see what happens.

    Robert



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Apr 15 2003 - 14:48:57 MDT