From: Spudboy100@aol.com
Date: Sun Apr 13 2003 - 12:28:28 MDT
Damien opined:
<<From all I've heard, foreigners
tend to not hate American people, just our foreign policy actions, which
considering we're supposed to be a democracy is arguably giving us more
credit
than we deserve. >>
Buzz! Sorry wrong answer. If you really buy into the notion that "we hate
your government, not you!" then you may have been nodding off over the last
year and a half. Hating a government doesn't apply when it people that are
attacked. And yes, this is consistant when you consider that governments
aren't imported from Mars, they are always recruited from the populace. So
let us both be consistant that when we attack a government, we are also
attacking a people. Otherwise, there would be no civilian body count or
colateral damage. Chirac has said it, as well as that German fellow on the
list. You may buy into that claim, but I do not. Me bad.
<<"Remove some settlements for peace", which we've heard before, while they
continue building a fence separating farmers from their lands. Very
pessimistic, I'd say.
-xx- Damien X-) >>
Well, sometimes good fences make for better neighbors, or at least less
violent encounters, if one removes the likelihood of encounters. For a
real-world example, look to the Nato enforcement of ethnically cleansed
regions of the Balkans. Why is there no massacres happening like there was,
why did the Serbs depose Milosevic?
In part because peoples who hate each other are physically separated. No
suicide bombers getting in, means no deaths, unless they are recruited from
Arab towns in Israel, which has been and is being attempted by Hamas, and the
PA's Al Quds division. If such farmers, as you noted, have already sent their
son's in as Shaheed, who will receive 72 virgins etc., then spearation seems
necessary, because nothing else would work.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Apr 13 2003 - 12:36:27 MDT