Re: Fwd: Question re: Bad ideas from Microsoft et al...

From: Charles Hixson (charleshixsn@earthlink.net)
Date: Wed Apr 09 2003 - 12:09:02 MDT

  • Next message: Adrian Tymes: "Re: Are we doomed yet?"

    Alex Ramonsky wrote:

    >>
    >> Hi,
    >> My wife would like to ask a question...
    >> ...
    >>
    >> /Could someone explain to me what happens if I write my own
    >> software? /
    >> //
    >> /Let's say I write a GUI Windows application called
    >> "Thing-Editor" which edits "Thing-Documents" (files whose format
    >> I define without reference to anything else). /
    >> //
    >> /Will any of these new "trusted" systems prevent me from
    >> compiling and linking my software? Will they prevent me from
    >> running it? Will they prevent me from giving away free copies to
    >> all my friends? Will they prevent the distribution of
    >> "Thing-Documents"? /
    >> //
    >> /Surely, a box which won't let you compile and run programs isn't
    >> really a computer - it's an entertainment console. /
    >> //
    >> /Have I misunderstood this or am I right to be scared?
    >> /
    >>
    >> ...
    >> Jill
    >
    >
    As I understand the proposed implementation, only MS signed & approved
    software would be allowed to run, although there was talk that the first
    versions would allow you to bypass the restriction after reading a
    warning. This might or might not include programs that you had written
    yourself. Perhaps programs created on your computer wouldn't trigger
    the flag. (This is certainly technically possible, but I don't know
    what the intention is.

    Entertainment console isn't a bad description. Many have held the X box
    up as the current prototype for the new MS environment. They probably
    don't have any inside information, but one can't be sure. But with MS
    working toward "Web Services", they may not even envision you storing
    the files that you create on your local disk. (They already seem to be
    claiming ownership of all documents produced with their
    software...though I'm not sure as IANAL -- and since I long ago decided
    not to agree to their EULAs, I can only read what others post about
    them. But they were already bad enough.) So it looks like the target
    environment that they are aiming for has all data stored remotely, and
    processed by programs that reside on remote servers. Possily the
    computation will also be done remotely. The services would be
    subscription based, and under total control of MS. Sort of like the old
    time-share computer setup that mainframes used to use. In that light,
    what they would be leasing (not selling) would be a fancy access
    terminal to which you had strictly limited rights. It's a model that's
    worked before.

    -- 
    -- Charles Hixson
    Gnu software that is free,
    The best is yet to be.
    


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Apr 09 2003 - 12:18:26 MDT