From: Samantha Atkins (samantha@objectent.com)
Date: Wed Apr 09 2003 - 00:40:38 MDT
Michael Wiik wrote:
> Michael S. Lorrey wrote:
>
>> b) transhumanist technologies can only be safely developed if the
>> nations of the world are all peaceful and democratic nations of free
>> peoples. In a world of nanotech, AI, etc., low trust societies cannot
>> be permitted to exist. All human beings must grow up and learn to
>> rationally evaluate their own rational long term self interest. This
>> can only occur in free, high-trust societies.
>
>
> I totally agree with this. I do at times agree with Mike. It's just
> unfortunate that the only way the current administration can see how to
> accomplish this is through aggresive war. It may work, but it seems an
> extremely risky strategy.
>
I don't see how it is remotely possible to create a world of
both freedom and fairly full access to technology - which I
believe requires greatly increasing the stake and buy-in and
perception of benefit by most of the worlds people - by
attacking them. Attacks give the opposite message that the
world is a very unsafe place and that they had best use whatever
technology to develop defensens and counters to those attacking
them. Teaching that it is legitimate to preemptively strike
those who may possibly someday strike you is an even more sure
way to insure that transhumanist tech will be used for great
destructrion and danger. I would be hard pressed to think of a
policy more unextropic in its likely consequences.
- samantha
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Apr 09 2003 - 00:42:56 MDT