Re: Nature of Ideology

From: Michael M. Butler (mmb@spies.com)
Date: Mon Mar 31 2003 - 10:49:09 MST

  • Next message: Charles Hixson: "Re: Ad Hominem fallacy again"

    On Mon, 31 Mar 2003 02:15:35 -0800, Lee Corbin <lcorbin@tsoft.com> wrote:

    > Damien writes
    ...
    >> I'm not sure I buy that politicians are a breed distinct from ordinary
    >> people.
    >> ... Ted Kennedy and Orrin Hatch being personal friends implies an
    >> acceptance
    >> of the Other which I think includes legitimacy of the opposition.
    >
    > Quite right. It's as though they're professionals, and
    > most of the rest of us are amateur partisans in comparison.
    > Oh sure, a few real idealists get into office, but it still seems to me
    > that they are a breed apart.

    They effectively think so. The expression used inside is, or at least used
    to be, "He's not a [real/serious] player..."; the kinder version is "He
    doesn't play at our level." I first heard this jargon in strategy planning
    for an Ohio State Representative campaign in 1967.

    That language gets used even in TV (The _West Wing_) nowadays.

    --
    I am not here to have an argument. I am here as part of a civilization. 
    Sometimes I forget.
    


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Mar 31 2003 - 10:54:45 MST