Re: [WAR] American POW's

From: Christian Weisgerber (naddy@mips.inka.de)
Date: Tue Mar 25 2003 - 18:34:33 MST

  • Next message: Hal Finney: "Re: state vs. insurers"

    <EvMick@aol.com> wrote:

    > Unfortunately the bad guys have captured some of OUR guys.

    I wish you had phrased this more objectively.

    > Five or so I think from the news reports.

    It is intriguing in itself that the Western media see it fit to
    report on the fate of what amounts to individual soldiers and that
    the situation seems to allow this. I guess I've watched too many
    WWII documentaries. Considering the size of the operation, why
    would anybody consider losses below the size of, say, a division
    to be newsworthy?

    > One thing that the news reports are emphasizing is that our guys
    > are "terrorized", "confused" and behaving in abnormal ways.

    I don't know whether American TV has by now shown the footage.
    Those POWs appeared to be in good shape physically. They did look
    awfully frightened, though. I can't tell whether their captors
    have given those kids any particular reason to be scared shitless,
    or whether the realization has simply struck home that this whole
    thing they're involved in is not quite like a video game.

    FWIW, the Iraqi POWs shown on TV looked apprehensive, too.

    > Is this in accordance with the rules of war?

    Considering that Rumsfeld some time ago proudly claimed his ignorance
    of those...

    -- 
    Christian "naddy" Weisgerber                          naddy@mips.inka.de
    


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Mar 25 2003 - 19:37:46 MST