Hit the Road, Jacques

From: EvMick@aol.com
Date: Thu Mar 20 2003 - 19:55:26 MST

  • Next message: Mike Lorrey: "Re: My Blind Spot - Patriot Act II"

    I recently came across the following article. Makes a lot of $en$e to me.

    EvMick

    JOHN FUND'S POLITICAL DIARY
    Hit the Road, Jacques
    Forget "freedom fries." Punish the French with green cards.

    Thursday, March 20, 2003 12:01 a.m. EST

    Congress is none too pleased with France's diplomatic betrayal over Iraq.
    House restaurants have renamed french fries "freedom fries." Rep. Ginny
    Brown-Waite (R., Fla.) has introduced a bill that would fund the repatriation
    of remains of U.S. servicemen who died in World Wars I or II and were buried
    in France. Others are boycotts of French (and German) products, or even
    economic sanctions.

    There's a better way to punish France. It's time to use immigration laws as
    an instrument of foreign policy, and Rep. David Dreier (R., Calif.), a
    respected internationalist who chairs the House Rules Committee, may
    introduce legislation to that effect.

    Traditional responses to countries with which we are unhappy but not at war,
    such as raising tariff barriers to their goods, hurt U.S. consumers and
    violate our own goal of freeing world trade. Sweet reason and visits from a
    parade of U.S. diplomats clearly haven't produced results. France's desire to
    humiliate America, along with its longstanding business interests in
    Iraq--and perhaps fear of what a successful invasion will uncover about
    French companies and officials in that country's archives--loom larger in
    Paris's decision making. So perhaps it's time to consider using the
    immigration lever. The U.S. could creatively use its dynamic culture and
    economy to get the French and others to consider the costs of their actions.

    By slightly loosening immigration rules, we could punish France by allowing
    more of its talented citizens into America. Immigration policy also could be
    used to open up trade in computers and medical technology and even help
    toughen patent and trademark protections.

    Each year more than 900,000 foreigners move legally to America. The number is
    limited by law, and the State Department allocates a certain number of
    immigration slots per country. No more than 25,620 may enter from any one
    land in a given year, and a 1965 law bars economic immigrants from entering
    the country if there are any Americans available and qualified to perform the
    job the newcomer is seeking. By slightly amending this law, varying the
    country allocations and the distribution of work permits to specific
    countries, and indeed particular individuals and professions in those
    nations, we can use the brain drain as a pinpoint method of sending a message
    to recalcitrant allies.

    Several thousand Frenchmen are on a waiting list to immgrate to the U.S.
    Still others are discouraged from applying by the long list, which can take
    years to clear. The U.S. Embassy could quietly let out word that we are
    passing out green cards or work permits to a certain number of French
    computer experts or civil engineers--or really hit below the belt by
    targeting French fashion designers and wine makers. Our high-tech and
    engineering professions could absorb 500 French computer specialists and
    1,000 civil engineers without seriously affecting U.S. pay scales, but France
    could ill afford to lose them.

    What could a Jacques Chirac do to retaliate? Invite Americans to France? And
    would he really denounce the U.S. for allowing greater numbers of French
    citizens to trade Boulogne for Baltimore? After all, Mr. Chirac himself likes
    to talk about the days when he lived in the U.S. in the 1950s and worked both
    as a chauffeur for a wealthy Texas widow and as a short-order cook at a
    Howard Johnson's coffee shop.

    This strategy would allow Washington tremendous flexibility. One hundred work
    permits or green cards could be given out each week, until, say, the Greek
    government agrees to further crack down on its anti-American terrorist cells.
    Or until other countries quit tolerating drug exporters. Obviously there need
    be no official acknowledgment that the increased issuance of green cards is
    tied to any specific response by any country. But they will know what is
    happening--and how to stop it. As David Frum of National Review says, "If
    that doesn't bring them to their knees, do it again!"A supply-side
    immigration strategy will also give Washington the opportunity to champion
    human rights and economic freedom in countries that are not officially allied
    with the U.S. What if strongman President Hugo Chavez of Venezuela doesn't
    allow a referendum on his continued rule as he promised later this year?
    Green cards to a certain number of Venezuelans. Does Brazil still refuse to
    reduce barriers to U.S. goods? Fine--let's invite interested Brazilian
    executives and professionals. Insufficient democratization in Saudi Arabia?
    OK, more green cards--for educated men and women.

    Rep. Dreier calls this approach "a positive-sum game for the U.S." It would
    also send a clear signal to our errant allies by denying them the skills,
    services and much of the income of their most prosperous and talented
    citizens. It reminds the world that America remains the world's most pleasant
    and prosperous place to live. And it would bring talented, resourceful and
    hardworking people to live among us and become Americans.

    The U.S. already has used its fairly open immigration policy to the detriment
    of communist nations. It attracted most of the talent out of Castro's Cuba.
    Soviet Jews and dissidents have enriched America, as have countless
    immigrants from Africa and the Caribbean. Now is the time to exert such
    subtle pressure on our unruly allies. Against Iraq the U.S. is about to use
    smart bombs and tanks. Against Osama bin Laden we are deploying a world-wide
    network of intelligence operatives. But in encouraging better behavior in the
    Western camp, our most effective instrument of foreign policy just might be
    the green card.

        



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Mar 20 2003 - 20:03:01 MST