Re: My Blind Spot

From: Hubert Mania (humania@t-online.de)
Date: Mon Mar 17 2003 - 11:09:19 MST

  • Next message: Adrian Tymes: "Re: welcome to the singularity"

    Allright. I give up. No more communication possible. A complete waste of
    time and energy. The falcons on this list live in a giant bubble and don`t
    even realize that they are isolated in the world. You are lost, my
    un-friends! I am too exhausted to answer the false arguments on this list
    anymore. It is pure disgrace. So let there be war. Let there be celebrations
    of killing children. Let us sit in front of the TV and watch the apparently
    surgical precision of the bombs. What a great laugh! Praise the Lord and
    pass the ammunition!

    Let there be even more misery and refugees.
    Go ahead and do your thing. But you will have lost a lot of good friends
    around the world and your credibility. The downfall of the USA as the only
    superpower has already begun. The ugliest American in the short history
    of the USA has raised his head in the form of Troubleyou Bush. What a sad
    opportunity to witness the downfall of a great nation.

    Love and peace

    humania

    ________________________________________________________

    > >
    > > Apparently, Mr. Mania, you have no sense of irony. The respondent was
    > > using acts that Saddam has committed, and which you and your country
    > > seem blithely unwilling to bring him to task on. The fact that you are
    > > so willing to remove Mr. Bush for acts which Mr. Saddam has committed,
    > > and not willing to remove Mr. Saddam, exposes your hypocrisy and hidden
    > agenda....
    >
    > "Yes, you are right, I failed to see the irony here. But anyway, your fine
    > President will be responsible for the deaths of American soldiers and for
    > invading a country. So, the reasons for accusation remain just the same,
    > no matter if I failed to detect ironic statements or not."
    >
    > So you now recognize the irony, but do nothing to answer the question?
    Why
    > would you support a move, unilitarerally or multilaterally, to depose Bush
    > as a war criminal but CALL Bush a war criminal for trying to do exactly
    that
    > with Saddam, who IS in fact a war criminal. Do you not recognize your own
    > hypocricy?
    >
    > "I also want Saddam to be removed but not on the cost of a mountain of
    > civilian Iraqui corpses, which will be a war crime."
    >
    > So you want Saddam removed, but at the cost of not a single Iraqi
    Civilian?
    > I would ask then, how many corpses has Saddam himself racked up?
    > Conservatives estimates, as others on list have mentioned, are around
    > 200,000. How many need he rack up before losing one Iraqi civilian
    (Perhaps
    > one he has tied to his front door) to remove him becomes just? Your
    policy
    > of absolutely no civilian casualities if implemented in *any* past war
    would
    > have lead to the immediate and catrastrophic rise to power of any and all
    > totalatrian regimes, we would today be the peoples planet of the soviet
    > union. If you considered Bush a war criminal, would killing one civilian
    be
    > just in ousting his tryannical regime, what if he has all-ready killed
    > 100,000s of thousands, and there is no reason to suspect he will stop?
    >
    > In short, you seem ready to jump on the 'remove the murderous bastard'
    > bandwagon only if it is Bush who is the 'murderous bastard'. Please
    outline
    > also a course of action that you would consider just in removing murderous
    > tyrants from power.
    >
    > "I never would have thought that I would ever have to defend a pacifist
    > attitude here on the list when I started reading extropian mails in 1996."
    >
    > I never thought it would be overun with moral relativist apologist hippies
    > who don't care for the lives of anyone but the individuals in thier own
    > countries. Take a look at the number of human kills racked up by
    murderous
    > tyrannical regimes. R.J. Rummels excellent site "Power Kills" estimates
    > that in the 20th century alone these governments have killed 170 million
    > people. http://www.hawaii.edu/powerkills/20TH.HTM I have heard of no
    > german forces fighting the murderous North Vietnames attemptes to
    slaughter
    > and enslave the entire population of Indochina.
    >
    > "I am amazed how many rednecks are assembled here."
    >
    > I am amazed at your lack of understanding of these geopolitical issues.
    > Your absolute pacifism is irrational and illogical, and would lead to a
    > system that actually rewards murderous expansionist regimes. Try plugging
    > 'always cooperate' into any game strategy program and see how long it
    lasts.
    > Cooperate with a force invading your country? Coopoerate with a force
    > invading another country you are allied with? Cooperate with a murderous
    > government killing its own people? Where does this cooperation lead?
    >
    > "but I do support their stance against the Iraq war which is a disarmament
    > founded on peaceful methods and more patience."
    >
    > You seem oblivious or ignorant of the fact that the inspectors would not
    > even *be* in Iraq were it not for the credible threat of force from the
    US.
    > Note 'Credible' in that statement. This is why the inspectors were absent
    > for the past 12 years. What if Saddam, as a murderous tyrant, is not
    > interested in 'disarmament founded on a peaceful method'? What would you
    > propose be done then, just wait and hope he changes his mind, while he
    > contiues to kill thousands of people?
    >
    > Why so ready to depose Bush for the same crimes that Saddam routinely
    > commits?
    >
    > And for the record, I am proudly quite pale.
    >
    > Michael Dickey
    >



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Mar 17 2003 - 11:15:12 MST