Re: whuffie estimate by popnicity vs snorellation

From: spike66 (spike66@attbi.com)
Date: Fri Mar 14 2003 - 09:01:55 MST

  • Next message: spike66: "Re: whuffie estimate by popnicity vs snorellation"

    hal@finney.org wrote:
    > From: "Hal Finney" <hal@finney.org>
    > X-Mailer: YaBB
    >
    > I like the idea of judging posts, although most threads have such a short
    > lifetime that it might be more work than it is worth.

    I dont understand the relevance of short lifetime. We
    could have a list of past topics and their pop/snore
    ratio. Topics come back again and again. This would
    encourage only the poppy topics, and may quell some
    of the perennial snorage.

    > One thing I just tried: I "applaud"ed Spike, and his positive score
    > went up from 6 to 7. I then just tried it again, and the BBS interface
    > game me a warning saying that I could not repeat an action within the
    > wait time, and that the wait time was 6 hours!

    Thanks, but I am nowhere near the record for applaud. If
    you were to use your effort in smitition, I am only a few
    score away from being the sultan of smite. {8-] spike



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Mar 14 2003 - 09:09:04 MST