RE: IRAQ sort of: Re: Tim May calls for nuking of D.C.

From: Lee Corbin (lcorbin@tsoft.com)
Date: Sun Feb 23 2003 - 10:54:18 MST

Next message: Ramez Naam: "RE: The Big Mideast Payoff Scandal (was Egypt)"

Previous message: Lee Corbin: "RE: No Planck limit for time!???"
In reply to: John K Clark: "Re: IRAQ sort of: Re: Tim May calls for nuking of D.C."
Next in thread: Kai Becker: "Re: IRAQ sort of: Re: Tim May calls for nuking of D.C."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

John Clark writes

> The only reason Saddam let inspectors back in is that the USA surrounded his
> country with 200,000 soldiers, that can not be maintained indefinably and
> the nanosecond that pressure is reduced he will kick the inspectors out just
> as he did before.

Yeah, but the day after the world-wide and highly publicized
protest marches, he got tough again and started withdrawing
concessions he'd made. So it must follow, by some of the
logic I see here and ther, that the protests were really
organized by the CIA, so as to embolden Saddam and thus
give Bush more justification for invasion.

Lee

Next message: Ramez Naam: "RE: The Big Mideast Payoff Scandal (was Egypt)"
Previous message: Lee Corbin: "RE: No Planck limit for time!???"
In reply to: John K Clark: "Re: IRAQ sort of: Re: Tim May calls for nuking of D.C."
Next in thread: Kai Becker: "Re: IRAQ sort of: Re: Tim May calls for nuking of D.C."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Feb 23 2003 - 10:50:15 MST