From: Robert J. Bradbury (bradbury@aeiveos.com)
Date: Wed Feb 19 2003 - 17:59:17 MST
I disagree with Greg. I don't see the publicity as all that
damaging. It clearly shows a couple of fly-by-night operators
with agendas operating in a less-than-forthright manner.
It was an ESPN publication and we all know how that is
clearly the best source of high quality data.
Worst case -- we get a few less sports oriented people
preserving themselves cryonically. Since by the time
they are likely to be revivied "sports" as we know them
seem unlikely to be of much interest I don't exactly
view this as a significant loss.
The glass may be half full rather than half empty.
R.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Feb 19 2003 - 18:01:32 MST