Re: Bush budget has 0 dollars for Afghanistan

From: Dehede011@aol.com
Date: Tue Feb 18 2003 - 13:55:59 MST

  • Next message: Dehede011@aol.com: "Re: CONCUR: Re: META: Banning Iraq discussion"

    In a message dated 2/18/2003 12:56:02 PM Central Standard Time,
    mez@apexnano.com writes: Conversely, so long as the US props up dictators who
    oppress their own populace, the US is investing in future terrorism.

    Well, Mez, we haven't propped up bin Ladden. We haven't propped up Sadaam.
    As to the King that has taken over in Afghanistan apparently he was the
    Afghani's choice in the sense that he was the only one they would accept. I
    have to ask what right we had to impose someone else on them.
           Besides the US is always caught between getting accused of proping up
    some one on the one hand or throwing our weight around on the other. So
    which is it?
    Ron h



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Feb 18 2003 - 13:58:14 MST