From: Nathanael Allison (jubungalord@hotmail.com)
Date: Mon Feb 17 2003 - 21:10:37 MST
It is to the best of my knowlege that the decisions of the UN and of each
nation are still left up to a few people. The real questions should be of
the poor logic of these people. However it is really just a "hunch" to
understand why these people have chosen the position they do. Even with
direct evidence it would be highly unlikely for an individual to sum up the
opinions of one nations politicians. It is much more likely that the US
choosing war or France choosing anti-war derives from irrational ideas of a
few people. Then the media takes hold of the positions and propaganda
flurishes. Before you know it you have two people argueing over wether
France sold Iraq illegal weapons. To argue about something when niether
party in the argument can give accurate information is futile. It would be
like me trying to argue that two people on this lists I don't know but I
heard from this third person are idiots. The argument is meaningless. The
first question of an argument should be "what are we hoping to solve" it he
awnser is nothing than what's the point.
_________________________________________________________________
The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Feb 17 2003 - 21:12:47 MST