Re: War with Iceland?

From: Spudboy100@aol.com
Date: Mon Feb 17 2003 - 19:40:40 MST

  • Next message: Spudboy100@aol.com: "Re: War with Iceland?"

    Mirthful Damien B. opined:
    <<You're only urging this course of action, you poisonous little Australian
    toad, because in your hatred of these United States you hope to see our
    defenseless land crushed like a sacrificial lamb beneath of the Icelander
    jackboot. And I know why you're doing it, you want to get all that sugar,
    you miserable unpatriotic worm. It's a disgrace to be on the same list with
    you.
    Take care, Damien Broderick>>

    *Iceland as Mr. Crocker had earlier noted has fired no scuds.
    *Iceland has employed no Sarin gas against its purported citizenry -Kurds
    *Ice apparently has not initiated aggression against its neighbors
        -caveat on this issue, but it needed to be said.
    *Iceland apparently has no nuclear explosives program, but has gone
    geothermal.
    *Iceland hasn't attempted to build Gerald Bull's supergun
    *Iceland has not embarked on a massive smallpox propagation program.
    * Iceland has not yet attempted to test technetium as a radioactive agent.
    * Iceland has prepared no drones to release technetium from the air.
    * Iceland apparently hasn't allied itself with Islamist groups like Al Qeida
    * Iceland has not apparently used murder and mutilation of dissidents and
    their
       family members (via Uday's Group 999) as the means of staying in power.

    ***Though Bjork is a causus belli in my oppy!

    This was the short list and perhaps not even the best reason to eliminate
    Saddamo the magnificent. Note that there are several other nations bigger and
    uglier then Saddamo. These blokes will have to be dealt with, one way or
    another in the comming years.

    May Yog Sothoth guide your path
    mitch-o



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Feb 17 2003 - 19:43:04 MST