Road Safety by Country (was Fuel Efficient Cars)

From: BillK (bill@wkidston.freeserve.co.uk)
Date: Sat Feb 08 2003 - 05:44:09 MST

  • Next message: riel@nl.linux.org: "Re: world's most famous face says, "I want to live forever" on national TV"

    Fri Feb 07, 2003 05:35 pm Lee Daniel Crocker wrote:
    > Alfio makes a good point: the traffic fatality rate in Italy is
    > about 12 per 100,000; in the US it's about 15. So "safety" can't
    > be the primary explanation for the absence of micros from the US
    > market. Perceived safety, perhaps.

    I think we should show much caution in comparing road safety statistics
    between countries. Some countries are better at recording traffic deaths
    and accidents. Some countries have more vehicles per 100,000 population
    than others. Some countries have higher driving mileages than others.
    Some have more freeways (generally regarded as safer) than country
    roads. Some have more two-wheeled vehicles than others. Some have more
    injury accidents, but fewer deaths. Some have better emergency medical
    facilities than others.
    Rumor has it that in USA 'real men' don't wear seatbelts.
    In Italy every driver has to be the one in front. And so on.

    I found http://www.bast.de/htdocs/fachthemen/irtad/
    OECD - International Road Traffic and Accident Database, which has lots
    of data, only up to year 2000 though.

    Their figures for 'killed per 100000 population' indicate that UK,
    Holland, Norway and Sweden are well-behaved, boring drivers with around
    6 to 7 deaths. Italy is nearly twice this figure at 11. France and Spain
    are worse at around 14. Greece and Portugal seem to lead at 20 to 21.
    The USA comes in at around 15 deaths per 100,000 population.

    This OECD summary is dated 20/12/2002 and highlights some new trends in
    the accident statistics
    http://www.oecd.org/EN/document/0,,EN-document-0-nodirectorate-no-12-378
    63-0,00.html
    (copy and paste this two-line url together)

    (snipped)

    Although speeding and alcohol remain among the primary causes of
    fatalities, driving under the influence of drugs appears to be an
    increasingly widespread road safety problem. Recent research in Holland
    highlighted the increased risks involved in driving under the combined
    influence of drugs and alcohol - a problem related to prescription as
    well as illegal drugs.

    Some countries have seen recent increases in traffic deaths among older
    motorcyclists. The UK, U.S. and France, for example, have experienced a
    rapid rise in the proportion of fatalities involving riders between the
    ages of 25 and 64. In the U.S., the most affected group has been males
    over 40 years old riding large, powerful motorcycles.

    Countries with relatively good road safety records, such as the U.K. and
    the Netherlands tend to have tough enforcement and are more likely to
    stop speeders and alcohol offenders. Seat belt use, meanwhile, continues
    to increase, with more than 90% of vehicle occupants in countries such
    as Germany, Australia and New Zealand wearing them. However, a number of
    countries - including the United States, Austria and Hungary -- still
    report average usage rates of 75%, or below. About half of road
    fatalities could be avoided if everyone wore seat belts.

    ---------------------------------------

    I was unable to find any reference to micro cars being more dangerous
    than large cars. But it might be that other factors outweigh the risk of
    being in a small car.

    But it's tough if you are over 40, drink and take drugs and drive a
    large, powerful motorcycle!

    BillK

    __________________________________________________________________________
    Freeserve AnyTime - Go online whenever you want for just £6.99 a month for
    your first 3 months, that's HALF PRICE! And then it's just £13.99 a month
    after that.

    For more information visit http://www.freeserve.com/time/ or call free on
    0800 970 8890



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Feb 08 2003 - 05:46:24 MST