From: Anders Sandberg (asa@nada.kth.se)
Date: Thu Feb 06 2003 - 05:22:08 MST
On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 10:39:51AM -0000, Steve wrote:
> My physics is not particularly strong, but perhaps someone could tell
> me why a seeming observation of dual occupation of "space" might not
> really be a blur caused by dual/ persistent occupation of different
> points in time?
What do you mean? It doesn't make much sense to me. Are you talking
about the uncertainty relations? The uncertainty of position of a
particle can be viewed as an uncertainty in time fairly easily; if the
observer is moving relative to the observed system relativity will cause
a mixing of space and time, making the uncertainty a combination of
both. [Delta x * Delta p >= hbar and Delta t * Delta E >= hbar can be
seen as statements about the spatial and time components of the
relativistic location and momentum vectors].
> In that case, if there is a 'lag' between different times, then the
> MVT persistent phantom pineal eye could well have quantum connectivity
> with our brains because of dual occupancy of time...... no 'physical'
> pineal eye now, but it
> did start to develop in us embryonically, so has a biological latency
> and pattern, so maybe has an engram or organisational effect in our
> brains on quantum level.
This doesn't make much sense either. Note that the uncertainty relations
doesn't say that things have to happen at separate times, and in any
case relativity makes the concept of 'simultaneously' disappear - two
events that occur at different times to one observer can appear
simultaneous to another observer who is moving relative to the first.
-- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Anders Sandberg Towards Ascension! asa@nada.kth.se http://www.nada.kth.se/~asa/ GCS/M/S/O d++ -p+ c++++ !l u+ e++ m++ s+/+ n--- h+/* f+ g+ w++ t+ r+ !y
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Feb 06 2003 - 05:20:42 MST