RE: Hazards of Coal Burning was RE: Hydrogen as SCAM?

From: Rafal Smigrodzki (rms2g@virginia.edu)
Date: Wed Feb 05 2003 - 13:58:57 MST

  • Next message: BillK: "Re: Fuel Efficient Cars (was Oil Economics)"

    Michael Dickey wrote to Kai:

    > I understand how your close proximity to this event could give you a
    > particular point of view on it. But again, what about the 3 million
    > people who are dying every year right now? What if they lived right
    > next door to you? What if these 3 million people were everyone you
    > knew, and everyone they knew? Will their families feel consoled by
    > your concern about the vegatables being destroyed in Munich?
    >
    ### I was even closer to Chernobyl when it happened - in southeastern
    Poland. While of course I was angry at the communist regime for trying to
    stall with informing the public, and I was appalled by the sloppiness shown
    by Russians, I also know that most, if not all, of the "losses" of
    agricultural produce outside Russia were due to ill-informed scaremongering,
    rather than rational assessment of the situation. The amount of fallout was
    minimal, well below level which can produce measurable health effects, most
    of it in the form of short-lived isotopes, and therefore amenable to a
    quarantine. The hysteria was fanned by the EU farmers, who saw imports from
    the East as competition to their outrageously overpriced, heavily subsidized
    produce.

    This said, nuclear power plants in the heavily populated Western Europe
    would act as a force multiplier for any attacker or terrorist smart enough
    to blow them up, so European reticence about placing them in (almost
    literally) their backyards, is somewhat understandable.

    Rafal



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Feb 05 2003 - 13:59:18 MST