Space and Nano and Eric, oh my! was Re: Europe and Space

From: Michael M. Butler (mmb@spies.com)
Date: Mon Jan 27 2003 - 14:21:33 MST


Robert J. Bradbury wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Jan 2003, Max M wrote:

>>Then later, when we can do fully virtual designs, we can design cheap
>>and efficient space travel.
>
>
> I don't know whether it is generally known, but my read of Eric Drexler's
> literature and development history is that cheap access to space was
> one primary reasons he pushed to develop nanotechnology.

My little contribution to the history question:

I think (based on a presentation of his I attended in Minneapolis back around
1985 or 1986) that Eric started thinking hard about nanotech as a result of
looking at what he called "lightsails" (extremely thin solar sails) and the
backing structures they'd need to have in order to stay stiff enough to be
generally useful--you might be able to make "aluminized nothing" for the sail
surface proper using bulk techniques such as vapor deposition on a surface you
then evaporate away, but how do you put an efficient truss structure behind that?

And if you can build those sorts of few-atomic-diameter-dimension trusses at the
level nearest the sail surface, what *else* can you build? Uh oh, suddenly he's
not pointed toward a PhD in astro/aero....

But that's my impression based on one presentation, and might have more to do
with the trajectory of his presentation than with his thinking's actual path.

MMB



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Feb 02 2003 - 21:26:03 MST