Re: NO NO NO NO--THERE'S NO GOOD TIME FOR A G*N DEBATE!

From: ABlainey@aol.com
Date: Thu Jan 16 2003 - 14:02:38 MST

Next message: gts: "RE: Help with old thread/idea - building +angels +future"
Previous message: Anders Sandberg: "Re: Help with old thread/idea - building +angels +future"
Maybe in reply to: Damien Broderick: "NO NO NO NO--THERE'S NO GOOD TIME FOR A G*N DEBATE!"
Next in thread: Brett Paatsch: "Are we defeated by the very topics we feel passionate about? ( was Re: NO NO NO NO etc)"
Reply: Brett Paatsch: "Are we defeated by the very topics we feel passionate about? ( was Re: NO NO NO NO etc)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

In a message dated 16/01/03 04:01:06 GMT Standard Time,
thespike@earthlink.net writes:

> ABlainey@aol.com said:
>
> > Nice timing for bringing up the gun debate.
>
> NO NO NO NO!
>
> I'm sorry for my part in reviving this noxious weed, however sardonically.
> I'll never do it again!
>
> Just say NO!
>
> Damien Broderick
>
>

<G>

Next message: gts: "RE: Help with old thread/idea - building +angels +future"
Previous message: Anders Sandberg: "Re: Help with old thread/idea - building +angels +future"
Maybe in reply to: Damien Broderick: "NO NO NO NO--THERE'S NO GOOD TIME FOR A G*N DEBATE!"
Next in thread: Brett Paatsch: "Are we defeated by the very topics we feel passionate about? ( was Re: NO NO NO NO etc)"
Reply: Brett Paatsch: "Are we defeated by the very topics we feel passionate about? ( was Re: NO NO NO NO etc)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Jan 21 2003 - 17:10:21 MST