Re: `Betterhumans' = worsememe

From: Max M (maxmcorp@worldonline.dk)
Date: Wed Jan 08 2003 - 04:21:49 MST


Anders Sandberg wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 05:45:04PM -0800, Robert J. Bradbury wrote:
>>On Tue, 7 Jan 2003, Damien Broderick wrote:

>>>Couldn't have said it better. PLEASE rethink this awful meme/tag, people.
>>
>>I think the comments by Damien's friend have some merit.

> As for betterhumans, maybe the solution would really be a catchier
> slogan than "create the future" at the top of the page, one that
> expresses that we want to individually become better and happier.

Well this is a shining example as to why mass comunication is hard.
Personally I don't think the name matters that much.

Much like a child who is given a name, it will grow into it. The site
will define what "betterhuman" means by it's content.

"A rose by any other name is still a rose."

Any name will be misunderstood by somebody. Just think about
"Transhuman". Whenever I tell somebody that I am a Transhuman, they
start looking for my lady shoes and laugh.

But than again I must admit that "PostHuman" would be a better name for
a >H news site. Ie. the little wordplay with news and post in the name.

regards Max m

-- 
hilsen/regards Max M
http://www.futureport.dk/
Fremtiden, videnskab, skeptiscisme og transhumanisme


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jan 15 2003 - 17:35:50 MST