RE: [wta-talk] Re: QUESTIONS???? Better never to have lived?

From: Nathanael Allison (jubungalord@hotmail.com)
Date: Sun Jan 05 2003 - 13:09:35 MST


>To illustrate, consider the integer
>
> 8051212150013250014011305000919001205050003151802
>09140000002505190009000113000114000914200507051802
which by a most transparent cipher reads
>
>"Hello my name is Lee Corbin. Yes I am an integer
>but my pattern is that of a real person existing
>on Earth 2003 AD. I am less than a google long
>but still as you will see there is no doubt that
>I am he. I have his DNA, his memories, his beliefs
>and personality dispositions. Consult the weighty
>table of contents directly following..."

If human code were capable to run all the variations of human combinations
what would that solve?

Obviously you would have to define all the combinations of humans as "All
genetic and enviromental factors which cause the human code to change". In
other words, all the humans would have the same code with out these factors.
If the combinations were to have new genes and new traits they would be
inhuman. Or if the combinations would live in a new enviroment and get new
stimuli they would be inhuman. So a certain set of factors has to be
established to define the non-existing human combinations. Wouldn't these
combinations change as the alive humans change and they have different genes
and have different enviroments?

The awnser is the human code can only be defined in the present for a second
later it has changed.

What mathematical formula could we use to define the changeing human code?

Being human is it possible for our code to predict the future and then
predict ourselves?

_________________________________________________________________
MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jan 15 2003 - 17:35:50 MST