Re: TW A not A?

Ian Goddard (igoddard@erols.com)
Wed, 13 Nov 1996 23:50:27 -0500

At 07:49 PM 11/13/96 +0000, Sarah Marr wrote:
>At 02:54 13/11/96 -0500, Nadia wrote:
>
>>I know, it's a conspiracy.
>>Can we switch back to A not A again? At least Sarah writes to that one...
>
>Although, of course, you only know I write to it by comparing that state
>with the imagined state of my _not_ writing to it. Right?

IAN: Or to the regions of the known universe said not
to be Sara writing to it. No imaginary states contrary
to known states are required by relational identity theory,
which speaks to the point you had previously made regarding
a "not universe." The "not" of the whole, is the part,
thus the whole is internally relational.

************************************************************************
IAN GODDARD <igoddard@erols.com> Q U E S T I O N A U T H O R I T Y
------------------------------------------------------------------------
VISIT Ian Goddard's Universe -----> http://www.erols.com/igoddard
________________________________________________________________________