> I, too, cannot see huge differences between UIF and DIF,
IAN: The problem I see with "unlimited freedom" is that private
property is an integral feature of liberty and freedom. Private
property is defined by limits. If there are no limits to what I
can do -- that is, if I have unlimited freedom of action -- then
it follows that I can tread all over the property claims, i.e.,
the defined limits, of others.
If there is no right to private property I cannot even own my body.
If I cannot own my body, I cannot have freedom. Therefore unlimited
freedom for all localized beings is a contradiction. However, in a
nonlocal relm 'unlimited freedom' does have meaning. For example,
since identity is nonlocal, identity is unlimited and free,
where 'free' implies unbounded.
>> Rich Artym phrases this thus:
>>
>> For me it [ dynamic ] conjures up:
>> Dynamic - growth, pro-active, ever changing, transformation
>> Individual - independent thought and action, importance of self
>> Freedom - more options, (life) expansion, individual rights
IAN: Good points. And 'dynamic' does not imply treading over other's space.
**********************************************************************
IAN GODDARD <igoddard@erols.com> FREEDOM: to have it, give it.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Visit Goddard's Universe --> http://www.erols.com/igoddard/home.htm
______________________________________________________________________