John Clark writes:
> I've been hearing some talk (the current issue of Science) of writing
> a computer program that completely simulates a bacteria, in particular
> a Mycoplasma chosen because it has only 265 genes and is the simplest
> known life form that has a metabolism. It would be a huge project but
> Blue Gene might be able to handle it. Among other things we'd need
> to know the 3D shape of all 265 proteins the genes produced but some
> of those are already known, obtained from laborious X ray diffraction
> experiments. If we really can write such a program then we can truly say
> we understand how at least one life form works. Anyway I was encouraged
> that respectable scientists are no longer embarrassed to talk about
> such things. There is even talk of making the first artificial cell,
> one that is even simpler, perhaps with only 180 genes or so.
One of Gina's forwarded articles described similar progress in the DNA transcription complex, which forms messenger RNA from DNA. They have a pretty detailed 3D shape now, not quite at the atomic level yet. It also offers tantalizing hints of machine-like structure.
Then there is the whole process of construction of these devices, via self-assembly or perhaps by simpler specialized structures. Simulating the self-assembly of 40-odd proteins and RNA particles into a working ribosome will be a real breakthrough.
Hal