Miss Pop Ulation (was: population, homosexuality)

Pvthur@aol.com
Wed, 1 Dec 1999 11:39:56 EST

In a message dated 12/1/99 8:27:49 AM Mountain Standard Time, bradbury@www.aeiveos.com writes:

<< I think homosexuality might to some degree simply (be) a strong dose of human "hypersexuality" combined with a loss of discrimination for the a biologically "productive" mate >>

To paraphrase: 'I think gays are two people of the same sex who are having sex. Oh, and they're having too much sex.'

You are defining a term using that same term. And you're pandering to the common notion that gays are over-sexed. Shame on you. We don't need to be cured by you. Get used to it.

To quote: 'Evolution is a drag queen with many wigs.' - Charles Darwin

For humans, the twin pressures of predation and starvation have been diminishing for a long time, allowing our population to grow beyond all natural bounds. As we approach the big 10 billion, something has to give. I think mother nature is already on the job.

To assert: 'Homosexuality is an evolutionary response to overpopulation.'

This little answer solves a couple little problems: 1) Gays are unnatural. (No they're not.) 2) Gays are against god. (No they're not, or No god. Take your pick.)

John