Lee Daniel Crocker wrote:
> > Blaming the women??? Every single smart guy I have met has the attitude
> > that bringing a child into the world would be wrong because of over-
> > population!!! And the idea of 'doing it' with a guy less intelligent
> > than myself, makes me want to vomit.
> > Smart women like smart men. Don't blame the women if the men don't knock
> > them up.
> There are two people involved in that choice...
Right, so don't blame the women. (Sorry if it sounds like I am blaming the men).
> This is a very distressing phenomenon, and probably more important
> to the future than its lack of discussion indicates. Personally, I
> think one of the most valuable contributions any of us could make
> to the future is to breed like rabbits, and fight harder to blast
> the silly myth of overpopulation that prevents otherwise intelligent
> men and women from doing the same.
I agree. The whole idea of anti population has a very negative anti life aspect to it.
I also think it is a problem that child bearing, child rearing is considered to be a low status occupation.
Frankly, I think that some women are too stupid to make good mothers. Stupid women make very poor relationship choices, they have difficulty taking care of themselves, and they neglect their children.
Part of the problem is that 'neglected' children are often called 'unwanted children'. 'Unwanted children' are really the neglected offspring of parents too incompetent to take care of them.
Give a child to a mother of normal intelligence who swears up and down that she does want a baby. And 9 out of 10 of them will raise happy healthy children.
But you give a child to a mother with an IQ of 80, who thinks that having a kid is really cool. And everyone who sees the situation will shake their head and say 'that poor unwanted child'.