Re: E-prime -an interesting article.
M. E. Smith (mesmith@rocketmail.com)
Mon, 11 Oct 1999 14:43:56 -0700 (PDT)
Molloy went on to respond to the sentence:
"A fetus is a human.".
His response was redundant in that he used arguments
already well known in the E-prime issue. He did not
respond to my point that someone could just as easily
say:
"A fetus has the same rights as a human.",
my obvious point being that by shifting to E-prime,
the argument has not changed very much, hardly at all.
So, again, the value of advocating E-prime seems
questionable.
There, that was all in E-prime... Woops! Darn!
** *** ***** ******* ***********
M. E. Smith
mesmith@rocketmail.com
http://members.home.net/mesmith/
** *** ***** ******* ***********
Do You Yahoo!?
Bid and sell for free at http://auctions.yahoo.com