den Otter writes:
> Hmm, even if it [the surveillance] is private and distributed?
> Surely that could count as an expression of spontaneous
Even if you own an incorruptible camcorder, someone might still come and lock you up/torture you until you yield the secret. Distributing parts of the secret among several people just makes it tougher, not impossible.
I think ubiquitous surveillance is a remarkably bad idea. Once the infrastructure's in place, the potential for misuse is gigantic.