Max M wrote:
> From: Terry Donaghe <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> >"I do not advocate the initiation of force to promote social or
> >political goals."
> It sounds about as practical as comunism!
> What about preemptive strikes? I would hate to wait until I got hit by a
> mugger to react.
As the evidence shows, carrying concealed weapons has a significant deterrent effect on the population as a whole, while openly carrying weapons deters crime from the individual carrying. You don't need to initiate force to have an effect.
> Or how about hostile countries running the arms race with
> ill intent? Do we wait until the bombs are dropping?
As 50 years experience showed, Mutual Assured Destruction did a fine job of out blinking the potential agressors.
> I can think of so many exceptions to this rule that it is hard to take
> seriously. It is a good ideal though, and one that I think many of us live by
> whenever we can.
Please come up with some more concrete examples of why this would not work. The two you cited are obviously inadequate.