Perhaps a better scheme would be divided between strength of conviction, perceived evidence and theistic view. The irrational people are those who hold strong convictions in the absence of evidence, regardless of what they believe in.
(then we can get Bayesian about it and start to think about what
priors to use and so on...)
-- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Anders Sandberg Towards Ascension! asa@nada.kth.se http://www.nada.kth.se/~asa/ GCS/M/S/O d++ -p+ c++++ !l u+ e++ m++ s+/+ n--- h+/* f+ g+ w++ t+ r+ !y