From: email@example.com <firstname.lastname@example.org> To: email@example.com <firstname.lastname@example.org> Date: 15 December 1998 13:28
Subject: Re: Surveillance Technology
>Peter C. McCluskey [email@example.com] wrote:
>>This appears to allow the resistance to survive in a continually
>>decreasing area of low surveillance, but there's no obvious way for
>>the resistance to increase it's territory.
>You're assuming the resistance will be passive. If the surveillance freaks
>back us into a corner we'll just nuke 'em.
I thought the government was the one with the nukes?