Re: Surveillance Technology

Samael (
Tue, 15 Dec 1998 13:30:54 -0000

-----Original Message-----
From: <> To: <> Date: 15 December 1998 13:28
Subject: Re: Surveillance Technology

>Peter C. McCluskey [] wrote:
>>This appears to allow the resistance to survive in a continually
>>decreasing area of low surveillance, but there's no obvious way for
>>the resistance to increase it's territory.
>You're assuming the resistance will be passive. If the surveillance freaks
>back us into a corner we'll just nuke 'em.

I thought the government was the one with the nukes?