> daniel.fabulich wrote
> >can you prove that Green exists?
> go to <http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/bbs/Archive/bbs.obrien.html>
dan did but on his return he said:
>...I don't see how it demonstrates the existence of a "Green"
>spearate from all green things, or even a "mind" which is beyond its
>substrate. Did I miss something...?
well. yes and no. If this is a debate about platonic reality then it is I who have missed something. The point of gerard's paper is about qualia, which is what i thought you guys were meaning by the term green.
"The money power of the country will endeavor to prolong its reign by working upon the prejudices of the people, until the wealth is aggregated in a few hands, and the republic is destroyed."