> > On Tue, 17 Nov 1998, Kathryn Aegis wrote:
> > > I find this thread fun, but it seems to me that sweeping conclusions
> > > being made on very little data. I seriously doubt that most
> > > are first-born,
> EvMick <--------first born
Only child and adopted.
I'm starting to think only first borns are responding to this. I'm glad to see Tim Bates is offering to follow up on my suggestion for a more detailed group profile. Certainly part of this study should include a number of demographic variables other than birth order. Suggestions?