>I personally think that the numbers show that
>extropian posters, those who are active participants, tend to be pro-gun
>to a far greater degree than the population as a whole, so I think that
>this might also be included in any description of extropians, as having
>this tendency.
People react to labels.
Please consider a different label, such as "pro self defense", "pro
peacefully armed" or "anti victim disarmament".
"Pro gun" is exactly what antigun activist like as a label; meanwhile
they're busy as hell trying to keep themselves labeled "anti-violence".
>b) from the exercise of force by individuals willing
>to fight and die to gain such rights, authority, or power, either for
>themselves, or ==>>>for the group of people they represent. <<<==
Emphasis above mine.
>I cannot understand how any Libertarian
>atheist can not support the right of the individual to keep and bear
>arms. ANything other than this seems extremely hypocritical to me.
How about shortsighted? See the flagged part of your comment above.
"Oh, that? I _delegated_ that nasty thing. Let them pick up the garbage and
fight fires while they're at it. zzz...zZzZZZZZ..."
MMB
>--
>TANSTAAFL!!!
> Michael Lorrey
>------------------------------------------------------------
I'm getting erratic crashes in Eudora using the PGP 5.5 plugin, so no
spiffy sigs for right now :\ ...
(NOTE: Robotlike replies to the above address will fail;
*noncommercial* communications are welcome; kindly
substitute a hyphen for the asterisk in the above address.
Sorry for any inconvenience.)