Re: The Copy Paradox

Nick Bostrom (bostrom@mail.ndirect.co.uk)
Sun, 16 Nov 1997 13:46:01 +0000


Wesley Schwein:

> On Fri, 14 Nov 1997, Nick Bostrom wrote:
> > > I'd say I'm a verb.
> >
> > You are both making category mistakes here. The sort of things that
>
> I apologize wholeheartedly; I'll ask your permission next time I want to
> make a flip metaphor.

We'll let it pass this time, but please observe that repeated failure
to obtain prior written permission with the official stamp from the
goverment-funded Bostrom-commision against inappropriate metaphors
will result in legal actions. We recommend that you request our
5-volume binder on the existing regulations (350). Delivery times
are about 7 months at the present, so please be prepared to remain
silent for some time. We appologize for any inconvenience and wish
to remind you that we are here to serve you.

> > IMHO, if one is afraid of being mentally imprisoned by language
> > patterns, one is better advised to read Carnap and W. V. Quine than
> > to study this e-prime stuff.
>
> Agreed; e-prime and general semantics are wastes of time which perpetuate
> the ludicrous (in its strong form) Sapir-Whorf hypothesis. If you're
> interested in language, try linguistics. Steven Pinker's _The Language
> Instinct_ is a good start; it pretty much sums up everything I learned in
> undergrade linguistics in a highly readable form. Pinker, a
> psycholinguist who is the world's leading child language acquisition
> researcher, is also one of the loud proponents of evolutionary psychology.
> He makes a number of points that readers of this list should find
> interesting.

Thank you for the suggestion! I will take a look at it.

Nick Bostrom
http://www.hedweb.com/nickb