Since the Earth is/has been expnding, that would mean that perhaps in the
past the relationship was accurate (given that the moon has been the same
size since then, seeing how its solid cold, it appears that way), I wonder
when the date of that was.
<< > If these numbers are right, this is a good example, Danny, of how
> "sacred geometry" is bogus because they use bogus math, the don't do
> their homework. I suggest that you do yours so you don't get hoodwinked
> by this sort of stuff.
> -- >>
No, sacred geometry uses correct numbers, true sacred geometry. Why would
they use wrong numbers/equations? I was referring to a picture at a web
site, thats all, they obviously just did it to look cool, i wanted to know if
it was a correct relationship.
>This is not to say that all such relationships are bogus. I have a gut
>feeling that Bode's law may have an underlying cause based on the
>mechanics of the original solar accretion disk.
Do you mean the disk that formed the planets? What is Bode's law? I feel
the same way, I also believe there's a lot going on in saturn's rings, given
the braided rings, and god knows what else. Oh, there's also high voltage
bursts emanating from saturn that is synchronistic with a specific place on