Mark Grant wrote:
> Anders wrote:
> >I'm starting to think that we really need a "core reading list" and
> >a "good reading list". If I understood Max right, the books mentioned
> >in the principles were intended to embody the core ideas of >extropianism,
> >but there are so many good books that should be mentioned that are not
> >100% relevant (but still > 75% relevant) that we need a list for them.
> >Maybe "canon" and "apocrypha"?
> Good idea; I could go for that.