Re: Philosophy: It doesn't suck so bad we can't ignore it

From: Spudboy100@aol.com
Date: Sat Dec 23 2000 - 12:31:50 MST


Good question. Your previous post inspired me because I have heard many
professional philosophers have argued that their value to society is because
their learning and teaching, somehow serves the greater good. Mechanical
Engineering surely does serve the good of society when it is harnessed,
idealistically or philosophically, interesting and valuable goals.
Extropianism and Transhumanism seem to seek a greater good. Human empowerment
and the need to transcend warfare and death and disease appear to be laudable
goals. Keep up the good work!

Mitch

In a message dated 12/23/2000 1:37:21 PM Eastern Standard Time,
neptune@mars.superlink.net writes:

<< I don't understand how my article inspired those questions, but...
 
 Does mechanical engineering "owe anything, as a discipline, to promote the
 greater good?" I'm not trying to be sarcastic, but just to show that
 philosophy can be considered just as mechanical engineering, as a discipline
 or a body of knowledge. In either case, people use them for good or ill.
 
 Philosophies vary a lot too. One shouldn't assume that all of them are
 equal or as useful or as valid. In this vein, it's my belief that
 philosophy's purpose, against which it can't be measured, is to help
 individuals to live life. So in a sense, it should be for the good, though
 there is a lot of difference between different people and different
 philosophical systems over what is good.
 
 Cheers!
 
 Daniel Ust
 http://uweb.superlink.net/neptune/
 
 My "Rand the Libertarian," published in the current issue of _The Thought_,
 is now up viewable on the web at:
 http://uweb.superlink.net/neptune/RandLib.html >>



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon May 28 2001 - 09:50:39 MDT