"Michael M. Butler" <butler@comp-lib.org> writes:
> ...an article about how evil wicked opportunistic power scalpers are
> charging huge spot market prices for peak power, mentions near the end
> that the California power crisis is in part due to the claimed fact that
> a web hosting site can use ten times as much power as a normal business
> office building.
>
> Meanwhile, pundits have been pooh-poohing TransMeta's Crusoe processor,
> which was designed to run Intel code and sip power.
I'm having a discussion here with my friends on the power needs of a
really wired society. So what does the list think about the likely
power needs when everybody got their own wearable/smart cellphone on
all the time, ubiquitious computing is in every corner, wireless
internet in the air and bluetooth (or similar) devices everywhere?
It seems that to a first approximation everything would need sizeable
power, but on the other hand since we don't want to switch batteries
in every gizmo all the time powersaving is going to be a big thing
(not to mention limiting heating). On the third hand, sending things
wireless means that we will dissipate energy into the ether. On the
fourth hand more virtual communications *may* lessen the need for
physical transports - but then again, remember the "paperless office".
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Anders Sandberg Towards Ascension!
asa@nada.kth.se http://www.nada.kth.se/~asa/
GCS/M/S/O d++ -p+ c++++ !l u+ e++ m++ s+/+ n--- h+/* f+ g+ w++ t+ r+ !y
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon May 28 2001 - 09:50:37 MDT