**Next message:**Brian D Williams: "SOC/BIO Re: Forbes on Populism vs. "BigPharma""**Previous message:**John Clark: "Re: The mathematics of effective perfection"**Maybe in reply to:**Mitchell Porter: "Perpetual motion via entropy disposal (was Re: effective perfection)"**Messages sorted by:**[ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Eliezer writes:

*> Incidentally, one formulation I've run across online is that the
*

*> "Hamiltonian" refers to the (6N-1)D surface in (6N)D phase space with
*

*> constant energy, with the (as it turns out) first law of thermodynamics
*

*> referring to a constraint on the trajectory through phase space; i.e., any
*

*> individual point must move along the Hamiltonian hypersurface that has
*

*> constant energy.
*

Don't forget, position in phase space fully determines the future

trajectory (in the classical model). Phase space points represent

positions plus velocities. Given a point, you can trace the line

which the system will follow. In this model there is little need for

a hypersurface of constant energy. You could define one, but it's not

really very meaningful since you already know exactly where on that

surface it is going to go, given the initial position in phase space.

Hal

**Next message:**Brian D Williams: "SOC/BIO Re: Forbes on Populism vs. "BigPharma""**Previous message:**John Clark: "Re: The mathematics of effective perfection"**Maybe in reply to:**Mitchell Porter: "Perpetual motion via entropy disposal (was Re: effective perfection)"**Messages sorted by:**[ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

*
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30
: Mon May 28 2001 - 09:50:31 MDT
*